[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
:: صفحه اصلي :: درباره نشريه :: آخرين شماره :: تمام شماره‌ها :: جستجو :: ثبت نام :: ارسال مقاله :: تماس با ما ::
بخش‌های اصلی
صفحه اصلی::
اطلاعات نشریه::
آرشیو مجله و مقالات::
برای نویسندگان::
برای داوران::
ثبت نام و اشتراک::
تماس با ما::
تسهیلات پایگاه::
داوران::
ابر کلیدوازگان::
::
مقالات در دست انتشار
..
جستجو در پایگاه

جستجوی پیشرفته
..
دریافت اطلاعات پایگاه
نشانی پست الکترونیک خود را برای دریافت اطلاعات و اخبار پایگاه، در کادر زیر وارد کنید.
..










Creative Commons License




 
..
:: جستجو در مقالات منتشر شده ::
۱ نتیجه برای Critical Thinking Disposition

nasser behroozi، Seiros Allipour، Manizheh Shehni Yailagh، Esfandyar Sepahvand،
دوره ۱۲، شماره ۱ - ( ۸-۱۳۹۷ )
چکیده

The purpose of this study was to test a model of causal relationships of family communication patterns (conversation and conformity), metacognition and personality traits (openness to experience and conscientiousness) with critical thinking disposition mediated by epistemic beliefs of female high school students in Ahvaz in ۲۰۱۶. The sample consisted of ۴۰۲ high school students, who were selected by a multi-stage random sampling method. In this study, five questionnaires were used for collecting data, Family Communication Patterns of Koerner and Fitzpatrick, Metacognitive Awareness of Schraw and Dennison, NEO Five-Factor Questionnaire, Epistemic Beliefs of Bayless, and Critical Thinking Disposition of Ricketts. The structural equation modeling (SEM) method was used for analyzing the data. The results showed that all the path coefficients were statistically significant. The relationships of conversation, metacognition, conscientiousness, openness to experience, and epistemic beliefs with critical thinking disposition were positive and significant, and the relationship of conformity with critical thinking disposition was significant but negative. The model fit indices showed that the model fitted the data properly (CMIN = ۲۷۳,۶۴۹, df = ۵۰, CMIN / df = ۵.۴۷۳ (P <.۰۰۱), GFI = .۹۰, AGFI = .۸۳, NFI =.۹۱, IFI = .۹۲, TLI = .۸۹, CFI = .۹۲, NFI = .۹۱, and RMSEA = .۰۹). The indirect paths were also tested using the bootstrap procedure of Preacher and Hayes. The results indicated that all the indirect hypotheses had been confirmed.


صفحه 1 از 1     

نشریه بین المللی روانشناسی International Journal of Psychology (IPA)
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 33 queries by YEKTAWEB 4700