دوره 14، شماره 1 - ( 10-1398 )
جلد 14 شماره 1 صفحات 309-279 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kaabomeir N, Arshadi N, Beshlideh K, Naami A, Karami M. Testing a Model of Some Outcomes of Perceived Supervisor Need Support, Based on SDT. ijpb 2020; 14 (1) :279-309
URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-330-fa.html
URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-330-fa.html
Kaabomeir Noori، Arshadi Nasrin، Beshlideh Kioumars، Naami Abdolzahra، Karami Morteza. Testing a Model of Some Outcomes of Perceived Supervisor Need Support, Based on SDT. نشریه بین المللی روانشناسی. 1398; 14 (1) :279-309
Department of Psychology Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده: (4547 مشاهده)
The purpose of this study was to test a model of some outcomes of perceived supervisor need support based on Deci and Ryan's Self-Determination Theory (SDT). The participants of this study consisted of 193 employees of Marun Oil and Gas Producing Company in Khuzestan, who were selected by stratified random sampling method. The instruments used in the study were Need Support at Work Scale (Tafvelin & Stenling, 2018), Need Satisfaction at Work Scale (Tafvelin & Stenling, 2018), Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale (Gagné et al., 2015), Employee Well-being Scale (Zheng et al., 2015), and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale–9 (Schaufeli et al., 2006). Structural equation modeling (SEM) through AMOS-24 was used for data analysis. The bootstrap procedure also used for testing the significance of the indirect effects. Results indicated that the proposed model fit the data properly. Better fit and more meaningful results obtained by omitting 1 non-significant path (controlled motivation to job engagement) and correlating the errors of 2 paths. Findings showed that all direct paths except controlled motivation to job engagement were significant. Results also supported the mediating role of need satisfaction and autonomous motivation in these relationships. Based on findings, SDT is a useful framework for predicting employee well-being and job engagement through need support, need satisfaction and motivation.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
عمومى
دریافت: 1399/1/17 | ویرایش نهایی: 1399/5/4 | پذیرش: 1399/5/11 | انتشار: 1398/10/29
دریافت: 1399/1/17 | ویرایش نهایی: 1399/5/4 | پذیرش: 1399/5/11 | انتشار: 1398/10/29
فهرست منابع
1. Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2019). Religiosity and subjective well-being in the Arab context. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2335-1]
2. Amin, Z., & Akbar, K. P. (2013). Analysis of psychological well-being and turnover intentions of hotel employees: An empirical study. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(3), 662-671.
3. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045-2068. [DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x]
4. Beshlideh, K. (2017). Research methods and statistical analysis of research examples using SPSS and AMOS (For studies in humanities). Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.
5. Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York, NY, US: Psychology Press. [DOI:10.4324/9780203853047]
6. Campbell, R., Vansteenkiste, M., Delesie, L. M., Mariman, A. N., Soenens, B., Tobback, E., … & Vogelaers, D. P. (2015). Examining the role of psychological need satisfaction in sleep: A self-determination theory perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 199-204. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.003]
7. Chatzisarantis, N., Ada, E. N., Ahmadi, M., Caltabiano, N., Wang, D., Thogersen-Ntoumani, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2019). Differential effects of perceptions of equal, favorable and unfavorable autonomy support on educational and well-being outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 33-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.002]
8. Cohen, A., & Shamai, O. (2010). The relationship between individual values, psychological well-being, and organizational commitment among Israeli police officer. An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33(1), 30-51. [DOI:10.1108/13639511011020584]
9. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108]
10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. [DOI:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6]
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. [DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01]
12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological wellbeing across life's domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14-23.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.3.262 [DOI:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14]
13. De Cooman, R., Stynen, D., Van den Broeck, A., Sels, L., & De Witte, H. (2013). How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: Implications for work effort. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1342-1352. [DOI:10.1111/jasp.12143]
14. De Freese, J., & Smith, A. (2014). Athlete social support, negative social interactions, and psychological health across a competitive sport season. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 619-630. [DOI:10.1123/jsep.2014-0040] [PMID]
15. De Loof, H., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Teachers' motivating style and students' motivation and engagement in STEM: The relationship between three key educational concepts. Research in Science Education, Online Published, 1-19. [DOI:10.1007/s11165-019-9830-3]
16. Gagné, M., Chemolli, E., Forest, J., & Koestner, R. (2008). The temporal relations between work motivation and organizational commitment. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 219-241. [DOI:10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219]
17. Gagné, M., & Deci, L. E. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362. [DOI:10.1002/job.322]
18. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., & et al. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178-196. [DOI:10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892]
19. Garg, P., Rastogi, R., & Kataria, A. (2015). Promoting citizenship behaviors in workplace: The relevance of organizational justice and psychological well-being of employees. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 2, 2, 1-18. [DOI:10.1177/2278682115593439]
20. Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013b). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees' satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 450-460. [DOI:10.1080/1359432X.2012.665228]
21. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73-96. [DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.59215085]
22. Haddon, J. (2018). The impact of employees' well-being on performance in the workplace. Strategic HR Review, 17(2), 72-77. [DOI:10.1108/SHR-01-2018-0009]
23. Hagger, M. S., Hardcastle, S. J., Chater, A., Mallet, C., Pal, S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2014). Autonomous and controlled motivational regulations for multiple health-related behaviors: Between- and within-participants analyses. Health Psychology & Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 565-601. [DOI:10.1080/21642850.2014.912945] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Hocine, Z., & Zhang, J. (2014). Autonomy support: Explaining the path from leadership to employee creative performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 417-423. [DOI:10.4236/jss.2014.26048]
25. Hodge, K., & Lonsdale, C. (2011). Prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport: The role of coaching style, autonomous vs. controlled motivation, and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 527-547. [DOI:10.1123/jsep.33.4.527] [PMID]
26. Julien, E., Senecal, C., & Guay, F. (2009). Longitudinal relations among perceived autonomy support from health care practitioners, motivation, coping strategies and dietary compliance in a sample of adults with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 457-470. [DOI:10.1177/1359105309102202] [PMID]
27. Jungert, T., Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B., & Osterman, U. (2018). How colleagues can support each other's needs and motivation: An intervention on employee work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67(1), 3-29. [DOI:10.1111/apps.12110]
28. Maguire, S. (1999). The discourse of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1), 109-114. [DOI:10.1023/A:1006162308722]
29. Medina-Garrido, J. A., Biedma-Ferrer, J. M., & Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R. (2017). Relationship between work-family balance, employee well-being and job performance. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 30(1), 40-58. [DOI:10.1108/ARLA-08-2015-0202]
30. Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T., & Liu, Z. (2012). A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 354-363. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.09.002]
31. Moreira-Fontan, E., Garcia-Senoran, M., Conde-Rodriguez, A., & Gonzalez, A. (2019). Teachers' ICT-related self-efficacy, job resources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations with autonomous motivation and work engagement. Computer & Education, 134, 63-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.007]
32. Nie, Y., Chua, B. L., Yeung, A. S., Ryan, R. M., & Chan, W. Y. (2015). The importance of autonomy support and the mediating role of work motivation for well‐being: Testing self‐determination theory in a Chinese work organization. International Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 245-255. [DOI:10.1002/ijop.12110] [PMID]
33. Olatunde, B. E. (2015). Job satisfaction and psychological wellbeing among mental health nurses. International Journal of Nursing Didactics, 5(8), 12-18. [DOI:10.15520/ijnd.2015.vol5.iss8.107.12-18]
34. O'Neil, L., & Hodge, K. (2019). Commitment in sport: The role of coaching style and autonomous versus controlled motivation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, Online Published. [DOI:10.1080/10413200.2019.1581302]
35. Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The "what," "why" and "how" of employee well-being: A new model. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 441-458. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-008-9270-3]
36. Parfyonova, N. M., Meyer, J. P., Espinoza, J. A., Anderson, B. K., Cameron, K. A., Daljeet, K. N., & Vaters, C. (2019). Managerial support for employees' psychological needs: A multidimensional approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 51(2), 122-134. [DOI:10.1037/cbs0000126]
37. Pinder, C., C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
38. Proctor, C. (2014). Subjective well-being. In A. Michalos, Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Publisher: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2905]
39. Reeve, J. (2018). Understanding motivation and emotion (7th Edition). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
40. Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 761-774. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761]
41. Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1-56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
42. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. [DOI:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020] [PMID]
43. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press. [DOI:10.1521/978.14625/28806]
44. Ryff, C. D, & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1-28. [DOI:10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1]
45. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004), Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. [DOI:10.1002/job.248]
46. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of Work Engagement with a short questionnaire. Education and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. [DOI:10.1177/0013164405282471]
47. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. [DOI:10.1023/A:1015630930326]
48. Sexton, J. (2013). The application of self-determination theory to employee motivation in Irish workplaces. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Post-Graduate Higher Diploma in Psychology at DBS School of Arts, Dublin, Ireland.
49. Siegrist, J., Wahrendorf, M., Knesebeck, O., Jürges, H., & Börsch-Supan, A. (2006). Quality of work, well-being, and intended early retirement of older employees: Baseline results from the SHARE Study. European Journal of Public Health, 17(1), 62-68. [DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckl084] [PMID]
50. Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., Patrick, K. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic view. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706-724. [DOI:10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
51. Tafvelin, S., & Stenling, A. (2018). Development and initial validation of the Need Satisfaction and Need Support at Work Scales: A validity-focused approach. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 3(1), 1-14. [DOI:10.16993/sjwop.30]
52. Tilga, H., Hein, V., & Koka, A. (2019). Effects of a web-based intervention for PE teachers on students' perceptions of teacher behaviors, psychological needs, and intrinsic motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126(3), 1-22. [DOI:10.1177/0031512519840150] [PMID]
53. Van den Broeck, A., Carpini, J., Leroy, H., & Diefendorff, J. (2017). How much effort will I put into my work? It depends on your type of motivation. In F. Franccaroli, N. Chmiel, & M. Sverke (Eds), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: An international perspective (3rd ed.). [DOI:10.1002/9781119168058.ch19]
54. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory's basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. [DOI:10.1177/0149206316632058]
55. Van den Broeck, A., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Van Coillie, H. (2013). Unraveling the importance of the quantity and the quality of workers' motivation for well-being: A person-centered perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 69-78. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.005]
56. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22(3), 277-294. [DOI:10.1080/02678370802393672]
57. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & De Witte, H. (2010). Unemployed individuals' work values and job flexibility: An explanation from expectancy-value theory and self-determination theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 296-317. [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00391.x]
58. Veld, M., & Alfes, K. (2017). HRM, climate and employee well-being: Comparing an optimistic and critical perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(16), 299-318. [DOI:10.1080/09585192.2017.1314313]
59. Williams, G. C., Halvari, H., Niemiec, C. P., Sorebo, O., Olafson, A. H., & Wesbye, C. (2014). Managerial support for basic psychological needs, somatic symptom burden and work-related correlates: A self-determination theory perspective. Work & Stress, 28(4), 404-419. [DOI:10.1080/02678373.2014.971920]
60. Williams, G. C., Patrick, H., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Lavigne, H. M. (2011). The smoker's health project: A self-determination theory intervention to facilitate maintenance of tobacco abstinence. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 32, 535-543. [DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2011.03.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
61. Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. H. (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621- 644.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1990 [DOI:10.1002/job.2033]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
