دوره 17، شماره 2 - ( 8-1402 )
جلد 17 شماره 2 صفحات 33-9 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tehranchi A, Keivani M. Relationship between Values and Character Strengths: The Mediating Role of Spirituality and Persistence. ijpb 2023; 17 (2) :9-33
URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-515-fa.html
URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-515-fa.html
Tehranchi Ata، Keivani Mohaddeseh. Relationship between Values and Character Strengths: The Mediating Role of Spirituality and Persistence. نشریه بین المللی روانشناسی. 1402; 17 (2) :9-33
Department of Psychology, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده: (4587 مشاهده)
The present study examined the relationship between character strengths, values, and behavior tendencies. Character strengths are positive traits that lead to virtues, while values represent higher-order goals that guide behavior. We examined two theoretical models proposed by Peterson and Seligman (2004) and Lavy and Benish-Weisman (2021). Two hundred seventy-two university students (53.4% women) were recruited and completed questionnaires measuring values, character strengths, altruism, and self-determination. Pearson correlation and path analysis were used to analyze the data. Our findings partially supported the first theoretical model, suggesting significant correlations between some character strengths and Schwartz's (1994) values. For example, the values of benevolence, hedonism, security, and self-direction were strongly correlated with kindness, appreciation of beauty, gratitude, and creativity, respectively. Stimulation was also associated with creativity and curiosity, while tradition was correlated with humility and spirituality. However, we also found significant correlations between most values and character strengths, undermining Peterson and Seligman's theoretical model. Additionally, we examined the mediating effects of spirituality and persistence on the relationship between higher-order values (transcendence and openness to change) and behavior tendencies (altruism and self-determination). Our findings support Lavy and Benish-Weisman's theoretical model, suggesting that character strengths significantly influence the relationship between values and behavior tendencies. These findings have important implications for educators and scholars who aim to promote autonomous, persistent behavior and spiritual experiences.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
تخصصي
دریافت: 1403/3/22 | ویرایش نهایی: 1403/8/12 | پذیرش: 1403/10/18 | انتشار: 1403/11/11
دریافت: 1403/3/22 | ویرایش نهایی: 1403/8/12 | پذیرش: 1403/10/18 | انتشار: 1403/11/11
فهرست منابع
1. Abramson, L., Daniel, E., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2018). The role of personal values in children's costly sharing and non-costly giving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 165, 117-134. [DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.007] [PMID]
2. Alborzi, S., & Alborzi, M. (2006). Investigating the relationship between self-determination and quality of life in talented students of Shiraz universities. Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 321-334.
3. Arieli, S., Grant, A. M., & Sagiv, L. (2014). Convincing yourself to care about others: An intervention for enhancing benevolence values. Journal of personality, 82(1), 15-24. [DOI:10.1111/jopy.12029] [PMID]
4. Azimpour, A., Neasi, A., Shehni-Yailagh, M., & Arshadi, N. (2012). Validation of "Prosocial tendencies measure" in Iranian university students. J. Life Sci. Biomed, 2(2), 34-42.
5. Beramendi, M., & Zubieta, E. (2017). Validation of the 40 and 21 items versions of the portrait values questionnaire in Argentina. Psychologia, 60(2), 68-84. [DOI:10.2117/psysoc.2017.68]
6. Bravo-Álvarez, M. Á., Vicente, E., Coma-Roselló, T., Miguel-Sesma, M. C., & Cerdán, A. (2023). Assessment of self-determination in mental health: A new application field of the AUTODDIS scale. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 46(4), 360-367. [DOI:10.1037/prj0000573] [PMID]
7. Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44. [DOI:10.1023/A:1014033032440]
8. Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 567-581. [DOI:10.1007/s10551-013-1680-8]
9. Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Morris, A. S. (2013). Prosocial development. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199958474.013.0013]
10. Fang, H., Wan, C., Jin, J., & Meng, L. (2022). Prior autonomy frustration facilitates persistent behavior: The moderating role of autonomy causality orientation. Motivation and Emotion, 46(5), 573-587. [DOI:10.1007/s11031-022-09961-2]
11. García-Vázquez, F. I., Durón-Ramos, M. F., Pérez-Rios, R., & Pérez-Ibarra, R. E. (2022). Relationships between Spirituality, Happiness, and Prosocial Bystander Behavior in Bullying-The Mediating Role of Altruism. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12(12), 1833-1841. [DOI:10.3390/ejihpe12120128] [PMID] []
12. Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Religiosity and prosocial behaviours in adolescence: The mediating role of prosocial values. Journal of Moral Education, 34(2), 231-249. [DOI:10.1080/03057240500127210]
13. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 965-983. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0]
14. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
15. Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Miquelon, P. (2007). A motivational model of persistence in science education: A self-determination theory approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 351-369. [DOI:10.1007/BF03173432]
16. Lavy, S. (2020). A review of character strengths interventions in twenty-first-century schools: Their importance and how they can be fostered. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 573-596. [DOI:10.1007/s11482-018-9700-6]
17. Lavy, S., & Benish-Weisman, M. (2021). Character strengths as "Values in Action": Linking character strengths with values theory-an exploratory study of the case of gratitude and self-transcendence. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 576189. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.576189] [PMID] []
18. Namdari, K. (2010). Standardization of Values in Action Inventory of Strengths ( VIA-IS) and the Effectiveness of Cognitive Hope Enhancing Training on Strengths of Dysthymic Clients University of Isfahan]. University of Isfahan.
19. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
20. Preston, J. L., Coleman III, T. J., & Shin, F. (2023). Spirituality of Science: Implications for Meaning, Well-Being, and Learning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 01461672231191356. [DOI:10.1177/01461672231191356] [PMID]
21. Prinstein, M. J., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of adolescent girls' externalizing and health risk behaviors: a 6-year longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 103. [DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.103] [PMID]
22. Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 1145-1163. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5]
23. Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 375. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375]
24. Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., Mussel, P., Carlo, G., & Hewig, J. (2017). Measuring prosocial tendencies in Germany: Sources of validity and reliablity of the revised prosocial tendency measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2119. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02119] [PMID] []
25. Rottensteiner, C., Tolvanen, A., Laakso, L., & Konttinen, N. (2015). Youth athletes' motivation, perceived competence, and persistence in organized team sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 38(4), 1-18.
26. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68] [PMID]
27. Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x]
28. Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (pp. 85-119). Sage Publications, Inc.
29. Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. [DOI:10.1037/12061-012] [PMID]
30. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 11. [DOI:10.9707/2307-0919.1116]
31. Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542. [DOI:10.1177/0022022101032005001]
32. Sheldon, K. M. (1995). Creativity and self-determination in personality. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 25-36. [DOI:10.1207/s15326934crj0801_3]
33. Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. (1996). Self Determination Scale. Creativity Research Journal.
34. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1270-1279. [DOI:10.1177/01461672962212007]
35. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222. [DOI:10.1037/a0016984] [PMID]
36. Yousefi, N., Pirkhaefi, A., & Borjali, A. (2020). Examining the psychometric properties (validation and validation) of the Portrait Values Questionnaire. Clinical Psy. & Personality / Shahed University, 17(2), 139-153.
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
