[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
reviewer::
Word Cloud::
::
In Publish
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Journal Statistics
Last 3 years statistics:

Submitted articles: 231
Accepted articles: 59
Rejected articles: 95
Published articles: 57

Acceptance rate: 25.54
Rejection rate: 41.13

Average Time to Accept: 175 days
Average Time to First Review: 20.4 days
Average Time to Publish: 76.1 days
____
..






Creative Commons License

:: Volume 20, Issue 1 (4-2026) ::
ijpb 2026, 20(1): 31-63 Back to browse issues page
A Comparison of Two Instructional Approaches: Flipped and Self Determination -Based Methods in Enhancing Students' Self – Regulation
Reyhaneh Moradi , Farideh Hamidi * , Bahram Saleh Sedghpour , Taher Tizdast
Department of Educational Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran & Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (908 Views)
In the context of Iranian higher education, where self-regulation is crucial for students’ academic success amid evolving pedagogical approaches, this study examined the comparative effectiveness of two learner-centered instructional models—self-determination–based instruction (SDI) and flipped instruction—in enhancing university students’ self-regulation. Participants included forty-five undergraduate psychology students from Islamic Azad University, Eslamshahr, who were assigned to two experimental groups and one control group. Each group received 10 structured instructional sessions, and students’ self-regulation was assessed at pretest, posttest, and follow-up using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). For data analysis, separate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were conducted for posttest and follow-up scores, with pretest scores entered as covariates to control for baseline differences among groups. Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons were performed to examine group differences. Results indicated that both instructional interventions significantly improved students’ self-regulation compared with traditional instruction, with a large effect size (partial η² ranging from .36 to .41). The SDI group demonstrated the greatest gains and significantly outperformed the flipped instruction group. Effects remained stable from posttest to follow-up, indicating the durability of the intervention outcomes. By emphasizing autonomy, competence, and relatedness in instructional design, these findings highlight the theoretical and practical significance of self-determination principles in fostering enduring self-regulation skills in higher education, providing evidence-based guidance for curriculum developers and university instructors to enhance students’ independent and self-directed learning capacities.
Keywords: flipped classroom, self-determination theory, self-regulated learning, quasi-experimental design, university students, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 1021 kb]   (77 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/11/17 | Revised: 2026/04/20 | Accepted: 2026/04/27 | Published: 2026/06/20
References
1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and Cognitive Load in the Flipped Classroom: Definition, Rationale and a Call for Research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 1-14. [DOI:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336]
2. Amirian, S. K., Rezaei, Z., Hatamikiya, S., & kareshki, H. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychology, 18(64), 85-108. Doi: 10.22054/jep.2023.68167.3645
3. Artino, A. R., Jr., La Rochelle, J. S., & Durning, S. J. (2012). Second-year medical students' motivational beliefs, emotions, and achievement. Medical Education, 46(7), 678-688 [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03712.x] [PMID]
4. Aslan, S. (2021). The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Pre-Service Teachers' Digital Literacy and Digital Pedagogical Competencies. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 16(4), 73-89. DOI: [DOI:10.29329/epasr.2021.383.4]
5. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day (pp. 120-190). Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1791200
6. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The Flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA (pp. 23-24). [DOI:10.18260/1-2--22585]
7. Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning: center for the study of learning and instruction, Leiden University, The Netherlands, and KU Leuven. In Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 422-439). Routledge.
8. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007]
9. Carter Jr, R. A., Rice, M., Yang, S., & Jackson, H. A. (2020). Self-regulated learning in online learning environments: strategies for remote learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 321-329. DOI:10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0114 [DOI:10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0114]
10. Chen, C.-Y., Yen, C. H., & Tsai, F. C. (2014). Job crafting and job engagement: The mediating role of person-job fit. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 37, 21-28. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.10.006]
11. Chen, H. J., Chen, C. H., & Wu, W. C. V. (2025). Effects of Flipped Learning on Language Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis investigating Moderators. SAGE Open, 15(2). [DOI:10.1177/21582440251331298]
12. Clark, R. M., Guldiken, R., Kaw, A., & Uyanik, O. (2025). The case for metacognition support in a flipped STEM course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 53(3), 720-748. DOI:10.1177/03064190241255113 [DOI:10.1177/03064190241255113]
13. Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-Regulation Empowerment Program: A School-Based Program to Enhance Self-Regulated and Self-Motivated Cycles of Student Learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537-550. [DOI:10.1002/pits.10177]
14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134. [DOI:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6]
15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. [DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01]
16. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108]
17. Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128. [DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6]
18. Hilpert, J. C., Stempien, J., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Husman, J. (2013). Evidence for the latent factor structure of the MSLQ: A new conceptualization of an established instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(3), 445-463. DOI:10.1177/2158244013510305 [DOI:10.1177/2158244013510305]
19. Hosseini Ravesh, R., Rezaiee, R., & Mosalanejad, L. (2022). Validation of the Persian version of the short self-regulated learning questionnaire for medical students: A descriptive study. Journal of Medical Education Development, 15(47), 1-10.. http://edujournal.zums.ac.ir/article-1-1634-en.html [DOI:10.52547/edcj.15.47.1]
20. Jeno, L. M., Danielsen, A. G., & Raaheim, A. (2018). A prospective investigation of students' autonomy-supportive and controlling teachers: Testing the motivation and self-regulation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2124. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2018.1502412 [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2018.1502412]
21. Kim, Y. E., Yu, S. L., & Shin, J. (2022). How temptation changes across time: Effects of self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and autonomy support. Educational Psychology, 42(3), 278-295. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2021.2009774]
22. Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001]
23. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A Critical Review of Flipped Classroom Challenges in K-12 Education: Possible Solutions and Recommendations for Future Research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, Article No. 4. [DOI:10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Martin, A. J. (2023). University students' motivation and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of lockdown, isolation, and remote and hybrid learning. Australian Journal of Education, 67(2), 163-180.doi: 10.1177/00049441231179791. [DOI:10.1177/00049441231179791] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Mirmoghtadaie, Z., Keshavarz, M., Kohan, N., & Ahmady, S. (2023). Developing a Conceptual Model of Self-Directed Learning in Virtual Environments for Medical Sciences Students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(2), 37-52. [DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.7024]
26. Moradi Doliskani, M., yonespour, Z., & Poya, M. (2021). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Teaching on Self-Regulatory Learning Strategies and Learning Motivation Components in Research Method Course among the Staff of AJA Research Center. New Educational Approaches, 16(2), 99-116. doi: 10.22108/nea.2022.132056.1728
27. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. [DOI:10.1177/1477878509104318]
28. O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of Flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002]
29. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030. OECD Learning compass 2030: a series of concept notes. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/tools/oecd-learning-compass-2030.html
30. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. [DOI:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3]
32. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33]
33. Russell, J. M., Baik, C., Ryan, A. T., & Molloy, E. (2022). Fostering self-regulated learning in higher education: Making self-regulation visible. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 97-113. [DOI:10.1177/1469787420982378]
34. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-Determination Theory. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 1-7). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2630-2]
35. Ryan, R. M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2023). Self-determination theory: Metatheory, methods, and meaning. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of self-determination theory (pp. 3-30). Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197600047.013.2]
36. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and Social Cognitive Theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article ID: 101832. [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832]
37. Shank, E., Tang, H. & Morris, W. (2025). Motivation in online course design using self-determination theory: an action research study in a secondary mathematics course. Education Tech Research Dev 73, 415-441. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-024-10410-9]
38. Shih, M., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Exploring the role of university students' online self-regulated learning in the Flipped classroom: a structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1192-1206. [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2018.1541909]
39. Skelcher, S. (2019). Cultural Conceptions of Flipped Learning: Examining Asian Perspectives in the 21st Century. Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 132-143. DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2017100102 [DOI:10.4018/IJICTE.2017100102]
40. Sun, Y., Zhao, X., Li, X., & Yu, F. (2023). Effectiveness of the Flipped classroom on self-efficacy among students: A meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2287886. [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287886]
41. Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a Flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best "blend" of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113-126. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003]
42. Thomas, K. D. (2025). Exploring Instructional Strategies Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory: Supporting Student Motivation in Online College Courses (Doctoral dissertation, Temple University).
43. Van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in Flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 158, 104000. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000]
44. Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1-31. [DOI:10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1]
45. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). nStudy: Tracing and supporting self-regulated learning in the Internet. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 293-308). New York, NY: Springer New York. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_20 [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_20]
46. Wu, S. J., Han, J., Sun, F. R., Wan, R. G., & Zhao, Y. Q. (2021). An integrated model for exploring college students' engagement and competence development in Flipped learning using partial least squares path modeling. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2351-2370. [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2021.1881799]
47. Wu, T. T., Lee, H. Y., Li, P. H., Huang, C. N., & Huang, Y. M. (2024). Promoting self-regulation progress and knowledge construction in blended learning via ChatGPT-based learning aid. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(8), 1539-1567. [DOI:10.1177/07356331231191125]
48. Yang, C. C., Wu, J. Y., & Ogata, H. (2025). Learning analytics dashboard-based self-regulated learning approach for enhancing students'e-book-based blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 35-56. DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12913-7 [DOI:10.1007/s10639-024-12913-7]
49. Yoon, M., Hill, J., & Kim, D. (2021). Designing supports for promoting self-regulated learning in the Flipped classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(2), 398-418. [DOI:10.1007/s12528-021-09269-z]
50. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2]
51. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-Regulated Learning and Performance. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203839010] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moradi R, Hamidi F, Saleh Sedghpour B, Tizdast T. A Comparison of Two Instructional Approaches: Flipped and Self Determination -Based Methods in Enhancing Students' Self – Regulation. ijpb 2026; 20 (1) :31-63
URL: http://ijpb.ir/article-1-638-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 1 (4-2026) Back to browse issues page
نشریه بین المللی روانشناسی International Journal of Psychology (IPA)
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 47 queries by YEKTAWEB 4745