[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
:: صفحه اصلي :: درباره نشريه :: آخرين شماره :: تمام شماره‌ها :: جستجو :: ثبت نام :: ارسال مقاله :: تماس با ما ::
بخش‌های اصلی
صفحه اصلی::
اطلاعات نشریه::
آرشیو مجله و مقالات::
برای نویسندگان::
برای داوران::
ثبت نام و اشتراک::
تماس با ما::
تسهیلات پایگاه::
داوران::
ابر کلیدوازگان::
::
مقالات در دست انتشار
..
جستجو در پایگاه

جستجوی پیشرفته
..
دریافت اطلاعات پایگاه
نشانی پست الکترونیک خود را برای دریافت اطلاعات و اخبار پایگاه، در کادر زیر وارد کنید.
..










Creative Commons License




 
..
:: ::
برگشت به فهرست مقالات برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Relationship Between Leadership Competency and Communication Competency in an Assessment Center Using Canonical Correlation Analysis
Eslamian Eslamian ، Kioumars Beshlideh ، Nasrin Arshadi
Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Shahid Chamran Unicersity of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده:   (585 مشاهده)
Assessment centers and competency models are modern approaches in organizational human resource processes. This research is an applied and descriptive study, and the aim is to investigate and analyze the relationship between two key competencies—leadership and communication—in an assessment center using canonical correlation analysis. In this study, from a population of 210 managers in an industrial company, 46 individuals were selected through purposive sampling and entered into the assessment center. The tools used to assess these two competencies were group discussion and group exercises, which have appropriate reliability and validity (Thornton, Rupp, 2006). The resulting data were analyzed using SPSS 23 software. This research showed that the canonical correlation coefficient between these two competencies was .441 and was significant (P<.05). As a result, the research hypothesis was confirmed, indicating a relationship between leadership and communication competencies. Additionally, as secondary objectives, the group discussion tool was identified as the most effective tool for assessing leadership competency with an in-canonical correlation of .669, and the group exercise was identified as the most effective tool for assessing communication competency with an in-canonical correlation of .926.
 
واژه‌های کلیدی: competency، assessment center، canonical correlation analysis، leadership، communication
     
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
دریافت: 1403/3/20 | ویرایش نهایی: 1403/10/20 | پذیرش: 1403/9/5
فهرست منابع
1. Afifi, A., Clark, V. A., & May, S. (2004). Computer-Aided Multivariate Statistics. Texts in Statistical Science. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, fourth edition. weighted summary statistics-a framework for localised exploratory data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(6), 501-524. [DOI:10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00009-6]
2. Alpert, M. I., & Peterson, R. A. (1972). On the interpretation of canonical analysis. Journal of marketing Research, 9(2), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149953 [DOI:10.1177/002224377200900211]
3. Alston, L. (1914). Hugo Munsterberg. Psychology and Industrial Efficiency. The Economic Journal, 24(94), 291-294. [DOI:10.2307/2222441]
4. Anderson, T. W. (1958). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. Wiley google schola, 2, 289-300.
5. Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 11th Edition. London: Kogan Page Ltd., 1062 p. ISBN 978-07494-524-21
6. Bass, B. M. (1950). The leaderless group discussion. Personnel Psychology, 3, 17-32. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1950.tb01679.x]
7. Bass, B. M. (1954). The leaderless group discussion. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 465-492. [DOI:10.1037/h0056881] [PMID]
8. Berger, L., & Berger, D. (2003). The talent management handbook: McGraw Hill professional.
9. Boyatzis, R. (1982), The Competent Manager, Wiley, New York, NY.
10. Bray, D. W., & Grant, D. L. (1966). The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management. Psychological Monographs, 80, (17, Whole No. 625, 1 - 27. [DOI:10.1037/h0093895] [PMID]
11. Buckett, A., Becker, J. R., Melchers, K. G., & Roodt, G. (2020) How Different Indicator-Dimension Ratios in Assessment Center Ratings Affect Evidence for Dimension Factors. Front. Psychol. 11, 459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00459 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00459] [PMID] []
12. Daft, R. L. (2003). Management (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: SouthWestern.
13. Dailey, L., Cohen, B., & Lockwood, W. (1999, June). Using assessment centers as a change strategy in a global company. Paper presented at the 27th International Congress on Assessment Center Methods. Orlando, Florida.
14. DeGroot, M. H., & Li, C. C. (1966). Correlations between similar sets of measurements. Biometrics, 781-790. [DOI:10.2307/2528074]
15. Gower, J. C. (1966). A Q-technique for the calculation of canonical variates. Biometrika, 588-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333664 [DOI:10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.588]
16. Harris, H. (1949). The group approach to leadership testing. London: Routledge and Paul.
17. Hornby, D., & Thomas, R. (1989). Towards a Better Standard of Management, Personnel Management, 21(1).
18. Horst, P. (1961). Relations among m sets of measures. Psychometrika, 26(2), 129-149. [DOI:10.1007/BF02289710]
19. Hotelling, H. (1935). The most predictable criterion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(2), 139. [DOI:10.1037/h0058165]
20. Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations Between Two Sets of Variates. Biometrika, 28(3/4), 321-377. [DOI:10.2307/2333955]
21. Howard, A. (1997). A reassessment of assessment centers: Challenges for the 21st century. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 13-52.
22. Hroník, F. (2007). Rozvoj a vzdlávání pracovník. Publishing as Grada.
23. Jackson, D. J., Michaelides, G., Dewberry, C., Nelson, J., & Stephens, C. (2022). Reliability in assessment centres depends on general and exercise performance, but not on dimensions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 95(4), 739-757. [DOI:10.1111/joop.12398]
24. Kendall, M. G. A Course in Multivariate Analysis (New York: Hafner, 1957). KendallA Course in Multivariate Analysis 1957.
25. Kleinmann, M., & Ingold, P. V. (2019). Toward a better understanding of assessment centers: A conceptual review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 349-372. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-014955]
26. Kolk, N. J., Born, M. Ph., Van Der Flier, H., & Olman, J. M. (2002). Assessment center procedures, Cognitive load during the observation phase. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 271-278. [DOI:10.1111/1468-2389.00217]
27. Koons Jr, P. B. (1962). Canonical analysis. Computer applications in the behavioral sciences.
28. Krause, D. E., & Thornton G. C. (2009). A cross-cultural look at assessment center practices: survey results from Western Europe and North America. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev., 58, 557-85 [DOI:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00371.x]
29. Kubeš, M., Spillerová, D., & Kurnický, R. (2004). Manažerské kompetence: způsobilosti vynikajících manažerů (Managerial Competences: Competences of Excellent Managers). Prague: Grada Publishing, 183, p. ISBN 80-24706-989
30. Lawley, D. N. (1959). Tests of significance in canonical analysis. Biometrika, 59-66.. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332808 [DOI:10.1093/biomet/46.1-2.59]
31. Lievens, F., & Thornton, G. C., III (2017). Assessment Centers: Recent Developments in Practice and Research. In The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection (eds A. Evers, N. Anderson and O. Voskuijl). [DOI:10.1002/9781405164221.ch11]
32. McCartney, W. W., & Campbell, C. R. (2006). Leadership, management, and derailment: A model of individual success and failure. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(3), 190- 202. [DOI:10.1108/01437730610657712]
33. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". American Psychologist, 28(1), 1. [DOI:10.1037/h0034092] [PMID]
34. Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers", International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 437-448. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.003]
35. Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a Vocation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
36. Putka, D. J., & Hoffman, B. J. (2013). Clarifying the contribution of assessee-, dimension-, exercise-, and assessor-related effects to reliable and unreliable variance in assessment center ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 114-133. doi:10.1037/A0030887 [DOI:10.1037/a0030887] [PMID]
37. Sackett, P. R., Shewach, O. R., & Keiser, H. N. (2017). Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 102, 1435-1447. doi: 10.1037/ap1000 0236 [DOI:10.1037/apl0000236] [PMID]
38. Sanchez, J., Levine, I., & Edward, L. (2012). The Rise and Fall of Job Analysis and the Future of Work Analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 397-425. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100401 [DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100401] [PMID]
39. Spychalski, A. C., Quinones, M. A., Gaugler, B. B., & Pohley, K. (1997). A survey of assessment center practices in organizations in the United States. Personnel Psychology, 50, 71-90 [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00901.x]
40. Steel, R. G. (1951). Minimum generalized variance for a set of linear functions. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 456-460. [DOI:10.1214/aoms/1177729594]
41. Talukhaba, A., Mutunga, T., & Miruka, CO. (2011). Indicators of effective communication models in remote projects, International Journal of Project Organization and Management, 3(2), 127-138. [DOI:10.1504/IJPOM.2011.039817]
42. Thornton III, G. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Assessment centers in human resource management: Strategies for prediction, diagnosis, and development. Psychology Press. [DOI:10.4324/9781410617170]
43. Vinograde, B. (1950). Canonical positive definite matrices under internal linear transformations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1(2), 159-161. [DOI:10.1090/S0002-9939-1950-0034746-2]
44. Wang, H. T., Smallwood, J., Mourao-Miranda, J., Xia, C. H., Satterthwaite, T. D., Bassett, D. S., & Bzdok, D. (2018). Finding the needle in high-dimensional haystack: A tutorial on canonical correlation analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02598.
45. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-333. [DOI:10.1037/h0040934] [PMID]
46. Wirz, A., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Lievens, F., Annen, H., Blum, U., et al. (2020). Do overall dimension ratings from assessment centers show external construct-related validity? Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. doi: 10.1080/1359432X. 2020.1714593 [DOI:10.1080/1359432X.2020.1714593]
47. Yang, X., Liu, W., Liu, W., & Tao, D. (2019). A survey on canonical correlation analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 33(6), 2349-2368. [DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2019.2958342]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


XML   English Abstract   Print



بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.
برگشت به فهرست مقالات برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
نشریه بین المللی روانشناسی International Journal of Psychology (IPA)
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 49 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660